![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Larry R. Hayward Why Isn't Her Sin Named? The earliest chapters of Genesis were written, among other reasons, to explain the origins of deeply ingrained human phenomena. These chapters attempt to answer such questions as:
As these opening chapters of the Bible march on, they address:
Each of these questions is addressed — and an answer given — through the narratives, poetry, and theological reasoning found in Genesis 1-11. I. One part of these narratives reveals a tendency — found in scripture and history — for men to hold women responsible for failings at least half their own. When God calls out to Adam: "Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?" Adam replies: "The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit from the tree and I ate."[9] Adam performs a linguistic feat with his answer: In one sentence, he manages to blame at both his wife and his God for a choice he clearly made himself. From this tendency of men to blame women, Hebrew society, ruled by men, developed, like many other cultures, elaborate laws and customs to keep women in less than equal circumstances.
From the tendency of men to blame women grew a tendency on the part of men to try to control everything female, particularly matters involving sexuality and reproduction. This tendency of men to control and dominate women goes much further back in history and is much more widespread geographically than The Stepford Wives might lead us to believe! II. The history I have just shared with you is not particularly uplifting. It may not be what you came to church to hear today. But there is good news. The tendency of men to seek to dominate women changed — radically — in the life and teachings of Jesus.
Thus, when people say — as they do — that the Bible suppresses women, they speak accurately. And when people say — as they do — the Bible places women in a higher and more vaulted position than many other cultures and religions and legal systems of its day, again they speak accurately. Both suppression of and respect for women are present in the Bible, but clearly the closer we get to the life of Christ, the movement is toward respect. This movement from suppression toward respect is a major reason that we in the Presbyterian Church — as well as most other Protestant denominations — believe that "both men and women" are "called…by God's providence…to hold [church] offices"[20] and that we are being Biblical in this practice. III. This complex history of both suppression and respect for women serves as background to the story we just read.[21] Our story involves a woman, a male religious leader, and Jesus. Notice what happens at the outset of the passage:
When the Pharisee witnesses this, he says (not to his guests but) to himself: "If this man were a prophet, he would have known who and what kind of woman this is who is touching him — that she is a sinner."[22] IV. This incident gives rise to several potential sermon topics:
Any of these topics would preach, but I want to focus on one central factor in the story today: the fact that the woman's sin is never named.
In his divine-human role, Jesus is all knowing, and this is one place in the text where his allknowingness come out. V. Now how does all this relate to us? First, inasmuch as we are like the Pharisee: It reminds us that we must always be wary about our temptation to think that we can identify someone else's sin. The fact is, only God has the power to identify fully, to know completely, to assess and understand a human act of sinfulness. We do not have that power or ability. Because of this limitation, we must guard against our inclination to "jump to conclusions" about someone else's life. Second, inasmuch as we are like the woman: This incident reminds us that most often, our sins are a matter to be first resolved in our relationship with God and God alone. Christ is clear that the woman sinned, but he does not share what her sin is with others; rather, it is only in the relationship between the woman and himself that her sin is resolved. Neither the religious institution — in the person of the Pharisee — nor us, the reader, have a right or need to know what her sin is. What is shared with us is the fact of her forgiveness and gratitude, not the details of her sin. Third, inasmuch as this incident relates to our relationship with Christ: This incident reminds us that Christ as all knowing:
Furthermore, it is precisely the fact that Christ knows her sins that leads her to receive forgiveness and healing. Christ's knowledge of her sins — and by implication his knowledge of our sins — is not something to be feared; rather, it is something to be welcomed and embraced as the starting point of forgiveness. In the sanctity of their relationship, Christ confronts her about her sin, forgives her in her sin, and leads her to gratitude. This confrontation, forgiveness and movement toward gratitude occur outside the gaze of the Pharisee or the reader. The ancient image we have that God knows everything we think and do is not something we need fear. Rather, in God's knowledge of us, God works with us to overcome all that is evil and destructive about us. V. I leave you with this:
While often, people close to us are legitimate participants in our movement from sin to forgiveness, it is not necessarily the case that anyone be involved other than God, as Christ, working with us through the Holy Spirit. There is an old spiritual whose words I have re-written to capture this personal and private movement from sin to forgiveness to praise — all within our relationship with Christ: Nobody knows the trouble I've seen Nobody knows the sins I've committed Nobody knows the forgiveness I've received Glory, hallelujah! 1 Genesis 2:25 and 3:7. go back 2 Genesis 3:14-15. go back 3 Genesis 3:16b. go back 4 Genesis 3:17b-19. go back 5 Genesis 3:16a. go back 6 Genesis 4:17. go back 7 Genesis 4:20-22. go back 8 Genesis 9:20-10:32 and 11:1-9. go back 9 Genesis 3:12 and 3:6b. go back 10 Deuteronomy 22:20-21. go back 11 Leviticus 15:19-30. go back 12 Leviticus 12:1-8. go back 13 Matthew 10:1-4; Mark 6:7, 3:16-19; Luke 9:1, 6:13-16; Acts 1:13. go back 14 John 7:53-8:11. go back 15 John 4:1-32. go back 16 Mark 14:50 and 15:40-41. go back 17 Matthew 28:1; Mark 16:1-4; Luke 24:1-3; John 20:1. go back 18 Matthew 28:1-10; Mark 16:9-11; John 20:11-18. go back 19 Matthew 28:7. go back 20 The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Part II, The Book of Order (Louisville: Office of the General Assembly, 2001-2002), G-6.0105. go back 21 Luke 7:36-50. go back 22 Luke 7:39. go back 23 Luke 741-50. go back 24 Even as responsible a commentator as Alan Culpepper simply assumes she is a prostitute. See R. Alan Culpepper, "The Gospel of Luke: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections," in The New Interpreter's Bible, Volume IX, Leander Keck, General Editor (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1995). go back |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
First Presbyterian
Church of Cedar Rapids Copyright © 2003-2007 First Presbyterian Church of Cedar Rapids. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||